iccaros

see this part # Restrict access to local domain Order Deny,Allow Deny From All Allow From 127.0.0.1 #Encryption Required </Location> add something like this (you need to knwo what your network address is) Allow From 192.168.1.0/24 then do a services cups stop services cups start then see if you can brows to http://ipaddress:631 from another computer..

Thanks, I also found this site.. and looked deeper in the MSDN and found samples, and as you stated they seam to have no restriction on these, I was scared off by the first find.. .. I should have restated my question. I found this site. http://www.softsteel.co.uk/tutorials/cSharp/contents.html I do wonder if MS is confused them selves on what there licenses say, I did not edit what I pasted so I am confused on what is the correct license, or maybe they added to the license, which sound like it would be hard to enforce.?? also any other books or information.. We are going to .net at work for

http://msdn.microsoft.com/vstudio/express/...rkit/#blackjack then you start to download the code.. you get this page http://msdn.microsoft.com/vstudio/eula.asp...29-4f4836532caa here is the permissive license Microsoft Permissive License This license governs use of the accompanying software. If you use the software, you accept this license. If you do not accept the license, do not use the software. 1. Definitions The terms "reproduce," "reproduction" and "distribution" have the same meaning here as under U.S. copyright law. "You" means the licensee of the software. "Licensed patents" mea

I have started playing with mono (AKA .Net for the non windows world) but I am looking for some tutorials and starter programs I can use..I went to csharp.net (a MS site) who had some cool programs except the license B) Platform Limitation- The licenses granted in sections 2(A) & 2(B) extend only to the software or derivative works that you create that run on a Microsoft Windows operating system product. means I can not use them for mono or Linux.. any pointers as the MS sites all use the Microsoft Permissive License, which as I pointed out means I can not use it. Thanks

which how-to?

it may be a acpi issue at the first prompt at boot type this is linux acpi=off its right after teh system starts to boot, most people hit enter here to make it boot..

follow these instructions.. http://www.wizardskeep.org/mainhall/tutor/neroiso.html

ya,, easy error just burn one ( I think the option is burn cd rom image.. ) good things those DVD-r are cheep..

are you sure you have a ubuntu disk? and you burnt the disk as a image and not tell nero to make a bootable cd ??

its sounds like your X server did not start.. information we need.. 1) what computer are you running this on ? (type, memory, video ..age) 2) do you have a diffrent computer you can try 3) try reburning the ISO image. the causes can be 1) an unsupported video card 2) your cdrom could be older and have problems with reading the early sectors of the CD.. this would not show up untill you try to boot from a CD.. 3) you have a bad burn.. don't worry that happens to everyone....

you could at boot of DSL change what resolution it uses.. or its problay sending a a Feq your monitor is not native at handaling.. your monitor should have in its menu a option to change screen sizes.. (shrink and enlarge)

I have not formatted the Solaris partition yet,,,just I prepared it for future installation. That has nothing to do with it being 0xaf or 0xbf.. that is a partition header.. Grub will look at the partition header and if it knows what it is, will mount it.. if not you have the rootover to tell it not to mount.. you can put any headder and still format it diffrently... example you can say its a 0x83 (Linux partition) and do a mkfs.vfat and it will format and mount as a fat32 partition. The point is, what ever created the partition looks like it gave it the wrong header ID and what ever made t

I'm thinking that what ever wrote the grub did not know what 0xaf is (should that not be 0xbf for solaris 10 ... see I learned somthing today...) and guesed that it's windows.... it should be hd0,0 did Fedora write this grub? as it would be how you would boot and unknown (to grub) file system like ntfs now with solaris 10 you will need solaris 10 to write your grub so that it can understand the new 0xbf partition, here is an exapmle of what it will write.. #---------- ADDED BY BOOTADM - DO NOT EDIT ---------- title Solaris 10 1/06 root (hd0,2,d) kernel /platform/i86pc/multib

forth edition.. great book, on eof teh few I understand what they are saying (better be good at $100) also throw out the disk if you get it.. the VC++ is 6.0 and non ISO complient.. (there are sever examples in the book that will not compile with it) any newer C++ (VC++.net example http://msdn.microsoft.com/visualc/vctoolkit2003/ ) will work and can be downloaded for free from MS, but I perfer DEV_c++ http://www.bloodshed.net/devcpp.html for windows (wx version has a form maker like a good windows IDE, I guess http://wxdsgn.sourceforge.net/ ) but mostly stick to gcc (maybe not the best but

sweet desktop Dragon. where do get that one? you know mac, it's sad, I just downloaded it today, but don't remember where from lol. if you want a copy of it, let me know I will post it for ya. Edit: found it http://animebabes.galeon.com/hotanimebabes/hotanimebabes.htm because with anime images they pay attention to details that a pic of a normal person just can't meet the standard of. just because you don't like it, doesn't mean everyone has to give up on it. Thanks for the Link

http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/sh...772#post1990772 "Solaris partition ID conflicting with Linux Swap is resolved since Solaris 10" now I see what my problem may be, I have been installing using fdisk in solaris to create partitions, then installing solaris 10 then install linux.. The fdisk Soalris tool I am using must still put 82 in the header.. did not think of that untill I saw your thread and mentioning using knoppix ot partition.. Thanks.. Back to the LAB...

This issue has been solved in Solaris 10 as has been mentioned in a discussion forum really, please point me to that fourm.. Linux still overwrites my solaris 10 partiton, thinking its a swap file.. UFS is still a 82 header.. so I would like to see what changed.. and maybe why the SUN engineers in our lab have this all messed up edit ok found it (9.5) Can I install Linux and Solaris on the same drive? Yes, with certain precautions. Be especially careful with RedHat Linux 6.1 (see below) Unfortunately, Solaris 9 and earlier and Linux swap partitions use the same ID, 0x82. So if you install Sol

http://fedoranews.org/contributors/bob_kashani/grub/

make sure your linux and linux swap are on extended partitions if you put solaris on there.. solaris will write over your linux partition as RAW swap, and Soalris and a Linux swap partiton use the same header.. so linux could overwrite your solaris partition.

ok not much time, as I have been in adn out of the hospital the last few days (my wife is expeted to actually give birth one of these times..) from command line do this echo "This is a test, only a test" >> /tmp/testfile cat /temp/testfile | lp you should get some output like this.. huskeyw@huskeyw ~/projects/sdl $ echo "test" >>/tmp/testme huskeyw@huskeyw ~/projects/sdl $ cat /tmp/testme | lp request id is UP_Stairs_Office_Linux_Printer-89 (1 file(s)) here is my cups.conf huskeyw ~ # cat /etc/cups/cupsd.conf # CUPS configuration file, generated by CUPS configuration tool. # This

you can use SSH to secure almost any network protocall http://www.jfitz.com/tips/ssh_for_windows.html

you can cheat snapshots.. just make a copy of the folder you have the "system" in.. this works well but takes up more space.

to add agian.. Gentoo is a good choice as it has boch, quemm (and kquemm) and vmware in its portage package system. its simple to install, just takes a little more time as you compile it.. but its a simple emerge command..

just a note... it is common pratice to use an OS that is not infetable with the exploits you are testing.. even with a good VM like VMWARE, a network exploit can still infect you main system.. BSD or Linux is a great host for testing windows exploits and no fear of it infecting your system.. just a thought

I would get a cheep video card (you can find 128 megs nvidia cards for $25 at compusa) before I ever used on board video sharing memory. too much using that memory pipe