martymas

Members
  • Content Count

    4314
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by martymas

  1. yo keith .

    i play a bit of banjo and guitar.

    and i played this number 20 years ago.

    with a lady guitarist.

    at the time i liked the raw music of the hillbillies.

    but once i got to my --------ties

    i need smoother stuff now.

    tho i like all forms of musics.

    but we all hve our personal likes and dislikes.

    marty.

  2. hi team not sure if any of you are familiar with bill mallenson

    who is a member of this board .

    we email each other now and then.

    and he posted this for me to read .at WS

    so thought i would share it with you .but i acknowledge it to him.

    hope it dosent offend some of our lady members.forgot to mention bill

    posts here every now and then.

    marty

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    1. Okay, okay! I take it back. Unscrew you.

    2. You say I'm a b!tch like it's a bad thing.

    3. Well this day was a total waste of makeup.

    4. Well, aren't we a damn ray of sunshine?

    5. Don't bother me, I'm living happily ever after.

    6. Do I look like a people person?

    7. This isn't an office. It's hell with fluorescent lighting.

    8. I started out with nothing and I still have most of it left.

    9. Therapy is expensive. Popping bubble wrap is cheap. You choose.

    10. Why don't you try practicing random acts of intelligence and senseless acts of self-control?

    11. I'm not crazy. I've just been in a very bad mood for the past 30 years.

    12. Sarcasm is just one more service I offer.

    13. Do they ever shut up on your planet?

    14. I'm not your type. I'm not inflatable

    15. Stress is what you have when you wake up screaming and you realize

    you haven't gone to sleep yet.

    16. Back off!! You're standing in my aura.

    17. Don't worry, I forgot your name too.

    18. I work 45 hours a week to be this poor.

    19. Not all men are annoying. Some are dead.

    20. Wait...I'm trying to imagine you with a personality.

    21. Chaos, panic and disorder...my work here is done.

    22. Ambivalent? Well, yes and no.

    23. You look like $hit. Is that the style now?

    24. Earth is full. Go home.

    25. Aw, did I step on your poor little itty bitty ego?

    26. I'm not tense; just terribly, terribly alert.

    27. A hard-on doesn't count as personal growth.

    28. You are depriving some village of an idiot.

    29. If a$$holes could fly, this place would be an airport.

    30. Look in my eyes...do you see one ounce of gives-a-$hit.

  3. hi team

    yes it is big news here.

    now all gov department compt are being viewed

    apparently health department compt are the next in line.

    so it is wide spread not only in gov dep.

    but now private enterprise are also investigating staff compt.s

    a freind who owns a music compturising. agency.

    has asked me if i new of software to block surfing on these sites.

    but i said that wont stop them.

    human nature isnt like that.

    he said i dont want to go back to

    typewriters ect.

    i said "you will have to put up with horny office girls "

    before any ladys on this thread think im discriminating he employs all woman.

    but it is a world wide phenominm.

    these are the ones who get caught.

    i must stres we have some of the most liberal laws on the planet.

    prostitution is legal--gay marriages has just been legalised.

    you can buy this material from outlets if you are 18 or over.

    if you are 18 or over you can drink alcohol.in pubs. [hotels]

    so it is no wonder this is being exploited.

    no i feel it is world wide

    how did the founders of playboy and penthouse become billionaires.

    not by pussy footing [excuse the pun]

    marty

    l

  4. hi team i was reading a post from chappy and the kid posted this which i thought was very good. i hope kailua kid dosent mind .

    marty

    Why do we press harder on a remote control when we know the batteries are getting weak?

    Why do banks charge a fee on "insufficient funds" when they know there is not enough?

    Why does someone believe you when you say there are four billion stars, but check when you say the paint is wet?

    Why doesn't glue stick to the bottle?

    Why do they use sterilized needles for death by lethal injection?

    Why doesn't Tarzan have a beard?

    Why does Superman stop bullets with his chest, but ducks when you throw a revolver at him?

    Why do Kamikaze pilots wear helmets?

    Whose idea was it to put an "S" in the word "lisp"?

    If people evolved from apes, why are there still apes?

    Why is it that no matter what color bubble bath you use the bubbles are always white?

    Is there ever a day that mattresses are not on sale?

    Why do people constantly return to the refrigerator with hopes that something new to eat will have materialized?

    Why do people keep running over a string a dozen times with their vacuum cleaner, then reach down, pick it up, examine it, then put it down to give the vacuum one more chance?

    Why is it that no plastic bag will open from the end you first try?

    How do those dead bugs get into those enclosed light fixtures?

    Why is it that whenever you attempt to catch something that's falling off the table you always manage to knock something else over?

    In winter why do we try to keep the house as warm as it was in summer when we complained about the heat?

    How come you never hear father-in-law jokes?

    If at first you don't succeed, shouldn't you try doing it like your wife told you to do it?

    And obviously if at first you don't succeed, then don't take up sky diving!

    The statistics on sanity are that one out of every four persons are suffering from some sort of mental illness. Think of your three best friends, if they're okay, then it's you.

    __________________

  5. some time back Jeff came on the board and

    explained how google was using this info.

    if i remember right, some one accused him of feeding the info to google.

    but he explained just what is in my link.

    to the article.

    that is what made me aware of this google thing.

    i havent used google for some time now.

    it is my personal choice.i really dont give a s---- what people think about it.

    choices are personal.i feel sorry for jeff being accused of some thing like this.

    google dosent need info from people they get it like it or not.

    marty

  6. actually dont use google my self this was sent to me by a freind .

    one of the reasons i uninstalled firefox was because i coulnd get ri of the .

    google search bar.

    ive been at this game for so long now .

    i dont have to use google .

    i only amswer the posts i know the answer to.

    like you im to old in the head for all that b-----t now

    when i was at techtv cfh

    i critersized the bush goverment .

    and whe i discovered google was keeping an eye on these message boards .

    that scared the s----t out of me

    i was told to type my last, i think it was my descending posts .at techtv

    and did i get a shock when one of those posts was that critisism of bush.

    so i regard google as a goverment spy.

    f------ em

    marty

  7. how many of you are familiar with merjin.

    well take note of this warning.some one posing as merjin.

    im nor familiar with the program .

    i think members who were tutored on how to read a hijack log file went to this site.

    not sure about this.people who know all about the program will be familiar

    with the warning.

    hope this helps some one

    marty

    Quote:

    merijn

    April22, 2005:

    Just a short note on the domain HIJACK-THIS.NET: this is not mine! It has been registered by XoftSpy (who are also on the Rogue Antispyware List on SpywareWarrior.com) and they are luring people into downloading their software believing it is HijackThis. Also, they have registered a few AdWords at Google leading to the same result. I have contacted them about this and received no reply (how surprising). Google can't do much about it since there is no copyright being breached. We'll see where this goes.

    In the meantime, if you want to download any of my programs, the official domain is and always will be www.merijn.org.

    --

    Official Member of the ASAP

    Wilder's Security Forum Admin

  8. has any one posted this or read this google article

    i dont use it ever since loud mouthed mr bush

    -----------------------------------------------------------

    Google Knows What You did Last Night

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Google Inc. is experimenting with a new feature that enables the

    users of its online search engine to see all of their past search

    requests and results, creating a computer peephole that could prove

    as embarrassing as it is helpful.

    The service allows users to decide if they want Google to

    automatically recognize them without having to log in each time they

    use the same computer. Those who prefer to log in on each visit can

    use a link that will appear in the right-hand corner of Google's

    home page.

    Whenever a user is logged in, Google will provide a detailed look at

    all their past search activity. The service also includes a "pause"

    feature that prevents it from being displayed in the index.

    Users will be able to pinpoint a search conducted on a particular

    day, using a calendar that's displayed on the history page. The

    service sometimes will point out a past search result related to a

    new search request.

    Google is hoping the service becomes so valuable that people will

    use its search engine even more frequently than they already do,

    giving the company more opportunities to display text-based ads that

    boost its profits.

    "We think there is some value in providing people with visibility

    into their past activity on Google," said Marissa Mayer, the

    company's director of consumer Web products.

    But privacy rights expert Pam Dixon is worried the service will make

    it easier for mischief makers, snoops and perhaps even the

    government to get their hands on a user's entire search history.

    "It's really a bad idea," said Dixon, executive director of the

    World Privacy Forum. "If you need to keep track of your past

    searches, I recommend using a notebook. It would be a lot more

    private and a lot less risky."

    Mountain View-based Google believes the service has adequately

    addressed privacy concerns, although Mayer conceded people who share

    a computer might not want to use the service. "This isn't for

    someone who is particularly sloppy about signing in and signing

    off," she said. "You have to have very good computer hygiene to use

    this."

    The online service is designed to store years of each individual's

    search activity, although users can remove selected links from their

    personal archive at any time.

    Because the history feature requires an individual login, it could

    help Google better understand each user so it can customize its

    results to reflect a person's specific interests, said industry

    analyst Charlene Li of Forrester Research.

    But Li doubts Google's latest feature will have mass appeal. "I

    don't think this is going to be very important to the average

    person," Li said. "Most people are kind of paranoid, so they are

    going to be wondering, 'Why should I give all my information to

    Google?'"

  9. hi team did your children answer like this .

    this gave me a laugh

    marty

    How Do You Decide Who To Marry?

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    HOW DO YOU DECIDE WHO TO MARRY?

    -------------------------------

    "You got to find somebody who likes the same stuff. Like if you like sports, she should like it that you like sports, and she should keep the chips and dip coming."

    Alan, age 10

    "No person really decides before they grow up who they're going to marry. God decides it all way before, and you get to find out later who you're stuck with."

    Kirsten, age 10

    WHAT IS THE RIGHT AGE TO GET MARRIED?

    -------------------------------------

    "Twenty-three is the best age because you know the person FOREVER by then."

    Camille, age 10

    "No age is good to get married at. You got to be a fool to get married."

    Freddie, age 6

    HOW CAN A STRANGER TELL IF TWO PEOPLE ARE MARRIED?

    --------------------------------------------------

    "Married people usually look happy to talk to other people."

    Eddie, 6

    "You might have to guess, based on whether they seem to be yelling at the same kids."

    Derrick, age 8

    WHAT DO YOU THINK YOUR MOM AND DAD HAVE IN COMMON?

    --------------------------------------------------

    "Both don't want no more kids."

    Lori, age 8

    WHAT DO MOST PEOPLE DO ON A DATE?

    ----------------------------------

    "Dates are for having fun, and people should use them to get to know each other. Even boys have something to say if you listen long enough.

    Lynnette, age 8.

    "On the first date, they just tell each other lies, and that usually gets them interested enough to go for a second date."

    Martin, age 10

    WHAT WOULD YOU DO ON A FIRST DATE THAT WAS TURNING SOUR?

    --------------------------------------------------------

    "I'd run home and play dead. The next day I would call all the newspapers and make sure they wrote about me in all the dead columns."

    Craig, age 9

    WHEN IS IT OK TO KISS SOMEONE?

    -------------------------------

    "When they're rich."

    Pam, age 7

    "The law says you have to be eighteen, so I wouldn't want to mess with that."

    Curt, age 7

    "The rule goes like this: if you kiss someone, then you should marry them and have kids with them. It's the right thing to do."

    Howard, age 8

    IS IT BETTER TO BE SINGLE OR MARRIED?

    --------------------------------------

    "It's better for girls to be single but not for boys. Boys need someone to clean up after them."

    Anita, 9

    "Single is better, for the simple reason that I wouldn't want to change no diapers. Of course, if I did get married, I'd just phone my mother and have her come over for some coffee and diaper-changing."

    Kirsten, age 10

    HOW WOULD THE WORLD BE DIFFERENT IF PEOPLE DIDN'T GET MARRIED?

    --------------------------------------------------------------

    "There sure would be a lot of kids to explain, wouldn't there?"

    Kelvin, age 8

    "You can be sure of one thing - the boys would come chasing after us just the same as they do now."

    Roberta, age 7

    HOW WOULD YOU MAKE A MARRIAGE WORK?

    -----------------------------------

    "Tell your wife that she looks pretty even if she looks like a truck."

    Ricky, age 10

  10. hi jcl.

    for personal preference i like linux sys's

    but because i cannot figure some of the applications out .

    i prefer not to go there.if i did and made mistakes i would blame the sys and not the user.

    so i stick with wondows .

    ok it isnt the 100 percent sys.

    but it is user freindly and mugs like me and millions of other prefer it that way.

    if linux was in the same catigory.

    i would give this xppro disk away.

    i have used mandrake 9.1 for about a year.

    but mandrake has come a long way since.

    and im not game to venture any further with it.

    i had trouble with. mozilla some time ago i went to import my favourites

    and it corrupted my favourites folder so i havent been there since.

    im not blaming the sys .

    there were no info on how to do this.

    so im stuck with win. comming ready or not.

    there isnt much i dont know about win xppro.

    on the compt i use.

    so im reluctant to change does that make sense.

    marty

  11. ive only had google once on my compt and i had a bad experience with it

    and since then ive had a bias against it .

    cant tell you why i feel like that human nature i suppose .

    i found i dont need it .

    also once i found that google was keeping tabs on millions of users .

    that was it for me .

    as example .i was told to type some thing i had posted at techtv.cfh.

    well that was scary.54 posts came up.

    aand one happened to be me critersizing Mr Bush over the iraq war.

    so that scared the s----t out of me.

    marty

    .

  12. thanks echobay

    there are always some one trying us out .

    and if it wasnt for posts like this we would be in the [what you sit down to do]

    at one stage i was so paranoid it was painful for me to leave my desk top.

    but through boards like this i feel as tho im no longer an apprentice.

    thanks again.

    marty

  13. yo keith hows tricks .

    yes i get sick of those p----s pirating the threads with their firefox properganda .

    if they like it keep it to them selves.

    i started a thread about .

    modems. some p-----k.

    came to the thread and said

    why dont you change to firefox.

    which didnt have any thing to do with modems.

    the guy is a troll at g4.

    i nearly blew a valve .

    im happy with IE and i have it pinging along nicely.

    i dont get spyware, virus ,or any of that sh-----t.

    because i have my sys.

    tweaked so i dont get that stuff .

    no wonder mozilla has 9 percent of the browser

    take. it is jammed down our throats.

    tho 9 percent is alot different to 90 percent .

    of IE users.

    if they like it well and good

    they wont change my mind.god i nearly swore then

    marty

  14. hi team have a read of this article .

    i know this atiicle has been circulated around the tech magazines .

    as i dont use firefox mozzilla or open source

    i can only vouch for IE so you have draw your own conclusions.

    happy reading.

    marty

    try here\

    this is the man who posted this article.

    For an industry built on logic--- at their deepest level, computers are logic circuits--- blatant illogic somehow manages to cloud many issues.

    Take FireFox http://www.mozilla.org/products/firefox/ , for example, a very nice browser from Mozilla.Org http://www.mozilla.org/ . It's free, Open Source, and the result of literally years of development. It's also a cross-platform application, available for Windows, Mac, and Linux--- a huge plus in computationally diverse environments because the configuration and training/learning curve is basically the same, no matter what platform the browser's installed on. Its human language support also is extensive, with versions in everything from Afrikaans to Welsh. No question: it's impressive software.

    Some also like it simply because it's not from Microsoft. I think this approach has some merit: Whenever Microsoft loses serious competition in any software category, it grows complacent, and the pace of innovation slackens. IE6, for example, came out in 2001; an eternity ago, in computing terms. Except for a boatload of security updates and patches, it's still basically the same browser it was then.

    But, US-CERT (United States Computer Emergency Readiness Team), a partnership between the Department of Homeland Security and the public and private sectors that impartially tracks all manner of security issues in operating systems and major applications, shows that the list of IE's current vulnerabilities is shorter than those for FireFox, Mozilla, and the other alternate browsers. Likewise, it also lists fewer Windows' vulnerabilities than for the other OSes.

    The last time I mentioned a similar US-CERT finding, by the way, Linux partisans leapt up to tell me that US-CERT didn't know what it was doing. Linux *couldn't* have more security flaws than Windows! Everyone *knows* that Open Source software is so much better than anything from Microsoft--- right?

    Well, to the dismay the more rabid anti-Microsoft partisans, reports from other independent observers corroborated CERT's findings.

    For example, between July 1 and December 31, 2004, Symantec documented 13 serious vulnerabilities affecting Microsoft Internet Explorer, but found 21 vulnerabilities affecting each of the Mozilla-based browsers.

    But don't take my word for it--- read the reports for yourself, see the methodologies for yourself, and decide for yourself: The article posted now (free!) at http://www.informationweek.com/stor...cleID=160900911 has all the details and links you'll need.

    I wrote that article to try to help readers interested in FireFox in particular and Open Source in general to make an informed decision. There are many, many excellent, proven, objective benefits to switching to Open Source software--- but there's also a lot of misinformation, and some very, very *bad* reasons to switch.

    For example, the "common knowledge" that FireFox is "more secure than IE" simply is false. Switching to FireFox for that particular reason--- in the belief that you'll magically and automatically be more secure--- is just plain wrong.

    But again, don't trust me, or any third party: Come see the source material for yourself, and make up your own mind. It'll only take a few minutes, and one way or the other--- whether you agree or disagree with me--- you'll have the facts at hand, and so can make an informed judgment, rather than one based on "common knowledge."

    Click on over to

    http://www.informationweek.com/stor...cleID=160900911 !

  15. hey you guys im starting to dream about.

    being in the future in an instant.

    because thats what will happen.

    i just read this book .

    where the machine was taking them into another dimension.

    hey buck rogers is here after all these years.

    and to think i used to think that was in the realms of fantasy.

    technology.keep comming

    the article says they arnt short of finance because many companys want to invest in the compt of the future.

    i wonder if they will take my 2 bucks hahaha

    marty