Brandon

Happy Birthday tommyd84 Have a great day..

Pizza steak(medium or high rare) crab legs

Hi Kat, I dont know you but welcome back

Story published by Secunia Source: H D Moore A vulnerability has been discovered in Microsoft Windows, which can be exploited by malicious people to compromise a vulnerable system. The vulnerability is caused due to an error in the handling of Windows Metafile files (".wmf") containing specially crafted SETABORTPROC "Escape" records. Such records allow arbitrary user-defined function to be executed when the rendering of a WMF file fails. This can be exploited to execute arbitrary code by tricking a user into opening a malicious ".wmf" file in "Windows Picture and Fax Viewer" or previewing a ma

obsession

prophet

desire

Congrats shanenin im sure you will do fine on windows and Congrats on your job

wild

crazy

Same here Danny, Im not going too buy PS3 or Xbox360 just Nintendo Revolution

Story published by Secunia Source: Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pena Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pena has reported a vulnerability in Bugzilla, which can be exploited by malicious, local users to perform certain actions on a vulnerable system with escalated privileges. The vulnerability is caused due to the "tmpsyncshadow" temporary file being created insecurely by the "syncshadowdb" script in the temporary directory. This can be exploited via symlink attacks to overwrite arbitrary files with the privileges of the user running the affected script. Successful exploitation requires that the malicious

Thanks for the head up Matt

car

Happy Christmas & Happy new year everyone

Merry Christmas & Happy new year everyone

Nice find

I just updated the solution, sorry about that..

perplexity

Im looking forward too listening too the radio once I can get onto it

mystic

dreamy

Congrats Matt

Agreed

Never had a problem running Norton AntiVirus 2005 on my windows98SE machine with only 192ram, my computer still ran fine... If you like Avast why not keep using it? Yes McAfee antivirus does have higher detection rates then Avast but doesnt seem too take up as much resources and possibly provides a different range of protection then McAfee does...I say stick with Avast unless you think avast is not protecting you as much as you like..