sultan_emerr Posted September 27, 2009 Report Share Posted September 27, 2009 I am glad to see that the Anti-Obama rift-raft are being dealt with. If this doesn't work, maybe they should send him to one of the "indoctrination" camps that the army is in the process of setting up.Story = http://www.johnsoncitypress.com/News/article.php?ID=71327 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
hitest Posted September 27, 2009 Report Share Posted September 27, 2009 Moving this topic to the World and Politics forum. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
isteve Posted September 27, 2009 Report Share Posted September 27, 2009 With the right media coverage this guy could make a killing. Wonder if he has a website. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
martymas Posted September 28, 2009 Report Share Posted September 28, 2009 (edited) dam typical right wing claptrapthey always have excusesto us billions out here we think obamais doing a difficultjob more than that a-----lewho made war on iraq to prop up the america economysee were it got tony blairthis redneck politicswill see this president assassinatedmillions of us predict italready some politician has called him a liarin parlimentunheard of in the historyof american politicsso rednecks have no boundrysmarty Edited September 28, 2009 by martymas Quote Link to post Share on other sites
hitest Posted September 28, 2009 Report Share Posted September 28, 2009 already some politician has called him a liarin parlimentunheard of in the historyof american politicsso rednecks have no boundrysmartyPartisan politics at its finest, marty:) They did the same to Clinton when he was President. Obama has a tough hill to climb, he has very powerful enemies in the pharmaceutical and insurance industries (their lobbyists can afford to spend hundreds of millions on trying to block health care reform).I certainly hope Obama really is a cool, tough customer. He is going to need to be one. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jcl Posted September 28, 2009 Report Share Posted September 28, 2009 already some politician has called him a liarin parlimentunheard of in the historyof american politicsSomeone should compile a list of all of the times Clinton and Bush were booed and jeered and accused of lying by members of Congress. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
isteve Posted September 28, 2009 Report Share Posted September 28, 2009 When Clinton and bush were booed and jeered it was just freedom of speech but say anything about the new boss and it's treason. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
hitest Posted September 28, 2009 Report Share Posted September 28, 2009 When Clinton and bush were booed and jeered it was just freedom of speech but say anything about the new boss and it's treason.Of course....partisan politics:-) I'm a Liberal and I'll admit that we can fire a few unfair shots across the bow. However, the media campaign that is being waged against the Obama health care plan is different in one respect. Obama's enemies have very deep pockets, they can afford to spend hundreds of millions in an attempt to sway public opinion. When Liberals throw a few jabs we don't have the financial clout of the pharmaceutical companies behind us. To say the debate is not on a level playing field is an understatement.As an interested outsider living north of your great country I can only hope that you will have some meaningful health care reform in the years to come. If you don't the lobbyists win. And you lose. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
TheTerrorist_75 Posted September 28, 2009 Report Share Posted September 28, 2009 When Clinton and bush were booed and jeered it was just freedom of speech but say anything about the new boss and it's treason.I think that should be, when Bush was booed and jeered, it was considered treason. Any time a liberal denounced Bush for the fool and puppet that he was we were considered Un-American and supporters of terrorism. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jcl Posted September 28, 2009 Report Share Posted September 28, 2009 However, the media campaign that is being waged against the Obama health care plan is different in one respect.There's a media campaign?Obama's enemies have very deep pockets, they can afford to spend hundreds of millions in an attempt to sway public opinion. When Liberals throw a few jabs we don't have the financial clout of the pharmaceutical companies behind us.In other news, the current health care reform plan was crafted by an insurance industry executive turned Baucus aide. [Edit: Gah, what happened with that link? Fixed, I hope]No one saw that coming. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Matt Posted September 28, 2009 Report Share Posted September 28, 2009 I think its a dumb argument. When I bashed Bush (which I did a lot) I got a lot of the "love it or leave it" replies. I was told that I was very 'un-American'. I shrugged it off. When people bash Obama, they should also expect opposition.Treason? Really? Freedom speech and opinion goes both ways, so everyone is going to face opposition. I don't understand why people feel that they are being persecuted. To those who feel that way I suggest: just shrug it off. If you have opinions, expect people to disagree. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
hitest Posted September 28, 2009 Report Share Posted September 28, 2009 [Edit: Gah, what happened with that link? Fixed, I hope]Ha-ha, yep fixed:-) Interesting article indeed. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
isteve Posted September 28, 2009 Report Share Posted September 28, 2009 The media is giving this administration a free pass on everything. There are still soldiers coming home every week in body bags, last year every news outlet would tally a body count now you almost never hear anything. There are still inmates in GitMo but they are now called Detainees not Prisoners so we're good there. We have spent more money in the last year then any other administration has ever spent. We bailed out companies so thousands of bankers can keep there six and seven figure salaries while we have just hit a new all time high unemployment mark. We just changed the law in Massachusetts so we don't need to elect a new senator we can just appoint one. The administration has appointed tax cheats and frauds to high level cabinet positions and as his Czars. And while all this is going on leno and letterman are making Clinton and Bush jokes, the so called news outlets are still going on about tea parties.And now we want to tax working people so Gangbangers, skinheads, career criminals, hillbillies, illegal aliens etc. have full health coverage adding 45 million more patients to our health facilities. And as it is right now hospitals don't turn anyone away. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jcl Posted September 28, 2009 Report Share Posted September 28, 2009 We bailed out companies so thousands of bankers can keep there six and seven figure salaries while we have just hit a new all time high unemployment mark.The national unemployment rate is still less than half of the peak in the '30s. (Or thereabouts. I gather that the way the unemployment rate is calculated has changed over the years.)We just changed the law in Massachusetts so we don't need to elect a new senator we can just appoint one.Like nearly every other state. The Constitution explicitly permits executive appointments to fill Senate vacancies.And now we want to tax working people so Gangbangers, skinheads, career criminals, hillbillies, illegal aliens etc. have full health coverage adding 45 million more patients to our health facilities.The taxpayers already provide those people with health coverage through the prison system.And as it is right now hospitals don't turn anyone away.And the taxpayers pay for that through higher insurance premiums. So far this seems to be a wash. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
isteve Posted September 28, 2009 Report Share Posted September 28, 2009 Higher percentage in the 30's but far more people out of work now.But just a few years ago when the republican governor was about to appoint a replacement the law was changed because they said the people need to have a say.And by rushing into a new healthcare plan nothing will change. Maybe we should come up with a plan that could make some changes not just for the sake of change. I personally don't care what health care system we use as long as I have coverage and it doesn't cost me more either in price or care. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
JDoors Posted September 28, 2009 Report Share Posted September 28, 2009 ... already some politician has called him a liarin parlimentunheard of in the historyof american politics...martyYou mean YOU weren't aware of previous outbursts.It's practically common now. Boos, hisses, harumphs, been goin' on for a long time.What's uncommon about this one is, he apologized. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Matt Posted September 28, 2009 Report Share Posted September 28, 2009 The media is giving this administration a free pass on everything. I can think of a certain media outlet owned by News Corp that would jump on Obama if he burped in public... and then call him a socialist.We bailed out companies so thousands of bankers can keep there six and seven figure salaries Wasn't the AIG et al bailout during the former administration?And while all this is going on leno and letterman are making Clinton and Bush jokes Shucks, I hate it when late night comedians don't cover the important issues!the so called news outlets are still going on about tea parties Wasn't the whole point of 70,000 people marching on Washington to make news?And now we want to tax working people so Gangbangers, skinheads, career criminals, hillbillies, illegal aliens etc. have full health coverage adding 45 million more patients to our health facilities. Yeah, those are the only people who would benefit from a public option. Certainly not a young post-graduate girl working two jobs and getting ready for grad school who lived my town who didn't have health insurance--and died. You're right. Obama wants to give a free ride to crack heads. That's his plan.And by rushing into a new healthcare plan nothing will change You're right it won't change anything. Everything good about the plan is being stripped out. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
martymas Posted September 28, 2009 Report Share Posted September 28, 2009 (edited) one thing i like about this boardwe are allowed opinionsbe rightwing or socialistin the past i lambasted the bush cheney GANGOVER IRAQand in the end my bleatings are truebut it still didnt stop the killing of people still going on is that called a bush cheney legacyfor me i would like to see obama bring all the people to getherhe has aready alerted the world he would like to talkisnt that a startisnt that why he was electedpeople had a guts full of rightwing agendaall of europe are for his mending relationshipswhat will happen if we dont do somethingthe world will go for atomic weaponsthen it dosent matter if we are right or left wing we all go up in smokemarty Edited September 28, 2009 by martymas Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Flatiron Posted September 28, 2009 Report Share Posted September 28, 2009 for me i would like to see obama bring all the people to getherhe has aready alerted the world he would like to talkThat will never happen!There are to many countries that hate us(USA). Always have & always will. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jcl Posted September 29, 2009 Report Share Posted September 29, 2009 Higher percentage in the 30's but far more people out of work now.Maybe not. The population in the mid-'30s was around 130 million and the unemployment rate at the peak of the Depression was around 25%. The population now is bit over 300 million and the unemployment rate is a bit under 10%. If the potential workforce as a fraction of population is the same, there would have been more people out of work in the '30s (32.5x million vs 30x million).Maybe we should come up with a plan that could make some changes not just for the sake of change.That's crazy talk. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
JDoors Posted September 29, 2009 Report Share Posted September 29, 2009 ,,, didnt stop the killing of people still going on is that called a bush cheney legacy... people had a guts full of rightwing agendaall of europe are for his mending relationships...martyYou're right that the wars (or whatever they want to call it) are still ongoing. Obama campaigned on the prospect of quickly withdrawing, but the reality of war must have set in (he's avoiding the inevitable right now: more troops are needed in Afghanistan).Funny thing about Europe: They're electing more center and right-of-center candidates. Apparently they haven't yet had their guts full. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Matt Posted September 30, 2009 Report Share Posted September 30, 2009 Obama campaigned on the prospect of quickly withdrawing, but the reality of war must have set in (he's avoiding the inevitable right now: more troops are needed in Afghanistan).False. Obama campaigned on the idea that we were going to increase troops in Afghanistan: Quote Link to post Share on other sites
hitest Posted September 30, 2009 Report Share Posted September 30, 2009 False. Obama campaigned on the idea that we were going to increase troops in Afghanistan: Exactly. Now comes the difficult part for Obama as he needs to live up to his campaign promise; his commander on the ground in Afghanistan is asking for more troops. It will be hard for him to send a lot of troops into harm's way, but, I think he needs to stabilize that theater. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
bozodog Posted September 30, 2009 Report Share Posted September 30, 2009 (edited) Funny thing about Europe: They're electing more center and right-of-center candidates. Apparently they haven't yet had their guts full. Of leftists? I think they're very full and making the turn back to the center, because the far left is running out of "entitlements" to empower them.Europe’s Socialists Suffering Even in Downturn Europe’s center-right parties have embraced many ideas of the left: generous welfare benefits, nationalized health care, sharp restrictions on carbon emissions, the ceding of some sovereignty to the European Union. But they have won votes by promising to deliver more efficiently than the left, while working to lower taxes, improve financial regulation, and grapple with aging populations. Edited September 30, 2009 by bozodog Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jcl Posted September 30, 2009 Report Share Posted September 30, 2009 Funny thing about Europe: They're electing more center and right-of-center candidates. Apparently they haven't yet had their guts full.We're in a recession. Germany and Italy are moving to the right. This will end well. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.