martymas Posted January 29, 2009 Report Share Posted January 29, 2009 hi team ive been experementing with win 98sesomething i havent done since the old techtv daysok i cant get drivers for my realtek cable cardand this means i have to install them on a cd on one machine then transfer them to win98se on another machinethere are several drivers missing from this cd but if i can get on line i can go lookok i know it is out of datebut to me it is something different from xp and vista where the sys installs these driversany ideasmarty Quote Link to post Share on other sites
MrBill Posted January 29, 2009 Report Share Posted January 29, 2009 Put it on a Floppy or CD and when it asks for it, point to it. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
JDoors Posted January 29, 2009 Report Share Posted January 29, 2009 If the card didn't exist while '98 was current then it's possible no one bothered to write a driver for that particular combination. I'd recommend going to the manufacturer's site (the card) to see if they have a driver specifically for Windows '98. If they don't support it any driver you use may not "speak the same language" as '98 and may not work, or may cause constant problems. If there is no driver, anywhere, specifically for '98, then that hardware probably won't work with '98. I use '98 and just don't install anything that isn't compatible -- I either have to find an older solution that IS compatible or not use the newer hardware (or software) at all. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
shanenin Posted January 29, 2009 Report Share Posted January 29, 2009 what is the realtek model. The most common chipset is the realtek 8139. Those drivers are definitely available Quote Link to post Share on other sites
martymas Posted January 31, 2009 Author Report Share Posted January 31, 2009 ok i tried the floppy thing but the sys says there isnt enough room on a floppy is there some way round thisi had trouble installing it on this machineas it would only go so far how ever i found i had an incompatable stick of ram once i pulled the stick out all was sweetso that is a lesson for methe sys has found most drivers by putting the 98se disk in the cd rom but the realtek cable connection is the problem win 98se has installed the driversbut it dosent workthats the advantage with xp and vistathose drivers come auto matic as long as the card is in the slotbut it has been a learning curve for me when i used it back in the old techtv days i was on dial up modem which i still have today i cant give them awaynz was very backwardas far as compting connection was concernedin those daysthat is why i learnd compting late in lifehow ever people like you guys dont realise how valuable you are to usersand you take it as a normal day to post fixesime to old for that marty Quote Link to post Share on other sites
JDoors Posted January 31, 2009 Report Share Posted January 31, 2009 what is the realtek model. The most common chipset is the realtek 8139. Those drivers are definitely available [emphasis added] Win '98 was actually pretty sophisticated about automatically installing drivers for hardware that it supports. I just replaced my DVD-ROM and when I started Windows it just said "Building Driver Database," Windows finished booting and that was all there was to it. It ran perfectly with no effort on my part because that particular hardware was in the Windows '98 driver database. If Windows could not install the driver for your card you have to supply the driver, and the driver has to support Windows '98. A driver file should fit on a floppy, so you got something else in there (or a defective floppy disk or drive). What file, exactly, did you try to fit on the floppy? Just the name of the file would help, where you got it would be helpful, and as Shanenin suggested, the exact model of the card. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
sceeter32 Posted January 31, 2009 Report Share Posted January 31, 2009 Have you tried here Drivers Guide This site usually has every driver avalible.Sceeter32 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Pete_C Posted February 1, 2009 Report Share Posted February 1, 2009 If it is too big for a floppy try a USB flash drive or burn it to a CD. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
martymas Posted February 1, 2009 Author Report Share Posted February 1, 2009 (edited) ok i solved the problemthe original card came with a driver cdbut i changed the card to suit win xp and vistanow with win 98 i had to reinstall the other cardand when i put the cd in the rom it instantly installed the driver to this cardold age makes me forget i had changed the cardime online now with 98 and with cable it is lightening fasti struck a coupla problemswhich i hope some one can help me every now and then a message says microsoft has struck a problem and will have to shut windowswhich has happened a coupla timesi remember in the old days chappie and pete had a fix for thisothwer wise it is going well thanks for the replys and help ive just installed avast so ime on my wayyou are much appreciatedmarty Edited February 1, 2009 by martymas Quote Link to post Share on other sites
JDoors Posted February 1, 2009 Report Share Posted February 1, 2009 ok i solved the problemthe original card came with a driver cdbut i changed the card to suit win xp and vistanow with win 98 i had to reinstall the other cardand when i put the cd in the rom it instantly installed the driver to this card ...marty Good going! I've no idea what program or hardware could be causing Windows to need to shut down, hope someone else knows how to troubleshoot that. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
martymas Posted February 1, 2009 Author Report Share Posted February 1, 2009 has any one seen this it was sent by a very good friend from the usai notice there are still some win 98se users on the boardso have a read and see what you thinkand we can discussmartyhttp://www.mdgx.com/spx/ Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Pete_C Posted February 1, 2009 Report Share Posted February 1, 2009 The biggest problems with using an old os are that first microsoft no longer creates new patches for it . When a new exploit is discovered in windows XP or IE7, chances are that the same hole exists in older versions; but microsoft only produces patches for the current products. The malware authors, as soon as a patch is released reverse engineer it to find out what it fixed and then create something to take advantage of that hole.Secondly with many software applications , the latest version just plain will not run on the older platform so you wind up running an older outdated version which the bad guys have written lots of nasties to take advantage of holes in to generate zero day exploits where they can install malware silently without you or your antivirus noticing it.But those points aside; for general purpose (checking email, visiting trusted sites) an older machine running an old os is probably fine.In the end; in the US you can get a new low end machine which so far surpasses the capabilities of an old win98 machine that it is ridiculous to keep it around for anything other than as a "guest" machine for the grandkids and visitors to use that you do not mind if they mess up or infect. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
JDoors Posted February 1, 2009 Report Share Posted February 1, 2009 (edited) Marty, briefly checked out the site, looks like it's just what I needed.Pete, with a firewall, updated virus definitions and safe computing it's tough to get infected no matter what OS you're using. Any OS is vulnerable to a day one exploit, that's kinda the definition of day one exploit. Just as new software exploits the new feature set of recent OS's and so will not work on old ones, new malicious exploits target new features and often will not function on old OS's (I've seen many new exploits that target features '98 does not have -- the definitions specifically say '98 is not vulnerable to those exploits). Just as no one's writing new programs or drives for old OS's, few write new malicious code specifically targeting old OS's. It's not a failsafe bet, but I doubt an outdated OS is MORE vulnerable than a new one. As time passes an old OS may even be MORE secure for the same reason Apple computers are less vulnerable -- no one's writing anything to exploit it 'cause few use it (or maybe you just don't hear about old OS's being compromised because nobody really cares ... ?). You definitely will not have access to new software, hardware, features, updates, etc. Apple, for example, does not support '98 for anything (so no Quicktime if it's a recorded in the last few years, no iTunes whatsoever, etc., but then I don't miss Apple products anyway). Even a "low end machine" can be beyond someone's financial means (you'll likely have to update your personal programs and external hardware too), or may not be necessary for ANY reason, or isn't the point at all (I originally didn't want an OS that has to have the manufacturer's permission to run -- though that philosophy may soon be moot if something breaks or it '98 becomes TOO disfunctional). ----- Oh yeah, any ideas how to troubleshoot Marty's "must close" thingy? Edited February 1, 2009 by JDoors Quote Link to post Share on other sites
martymas Posted February 2, 2009 Author Report Share Posted February 2, 2009 glad the link can be of help i thought of you when i recieved theemail he is a member of this board but at this stage ide like him to remain annon until he approves of me posting his namenow jd what sort of fire wall is needed for win 98m ive already installed a virus scannerso i need to follow your adviceat least this is giving vista a restthe machine with 98 is very old and very crotchetyive seen that message before windos will closeit used to happen if you had to many applis at oncethose days i used to use alt cntr deletebugger thati have to get used to waiting with a bit more patientswith xp you could load avast and adaware both at the same time but not so with win98marty Quote Link to post Share on other sites
JDoors Posted February 2, 2009 Report Share Posted February 2, 2009 Oh yeah, Windows '98 does not handle memory anywhere near as well as later versions. Once you're used to the newer versions, being able to open anything at any time, leave 'em all open, or not, have icons all over the place, use fancy wallpapers, screensavers, who cares! Newer Windows versions can handle it! And newer computers are SO fast and have SO much memory everything you run just ... runs. So run another program right away, and another, and another, who cares! Newer computers can handle it! Yeah, not so much with a Windows '98 machine. EVERYTHING you have on screen takes up precious memory. Icons, wallpaper, everything in the system tray, all suck up memory that would better be used for the program you're trying to run. You also need to keep an eye on your hard drive activity. You might be tempted to run another program thinking the first one's done working, you look at the hard drive light and it's chugging away like mad! Better not run that second program yet! The first one's either not done yet, or Windows has had to resort to swapping memory to finish what it's doing. ESPECIALLY if you're using newer hardware or programs. Newer stuff assumes you have tons of memory resources and a fast computer. I sometimes get the message, "[program name] is having difficulty starting, do you wish to continue trying to open [program name]?" Usually an Adobe product. It's not that there's a REAL problem, it's just that that program expects me to have an OS that handles memory well and a computer that's fast-fast-FAST! Windows '98 CAN run it, it just takes longer than the program expects. I just say, "Yeah, duh, I want to run it," and it eventually loads and runs fine. Re: Firewalls (I may get some info wrong, if anyone would be so kind as to correct inaccurate information it'd be appreciated). I got mine back when '98 was current and kept updating it until they said '98's no longer supported. Firewall technology hasn't changed much since then, if at all, so keeping up on that is a low priority for me. I have a DSL modem and every test I've run on the Internet essentially says it can't even see my computer. It's not because of the firewall, it's because my ISP "filters" traffic, the ISP acts as a "proxy" for my actual computer. That proxy keeps anyone from knowing where my computer is and trying to get something on it, so it automatically works as an "incoming" firewall for the Internet. I'm even less current on "routers" but I believe if you have one on your computer it essentially acts as an incoming firewall too. If YOU put something on your computer on purpose (for instance, if you take chances with software from unknown sources), or it gets on your computer by some other means (for instance, you visit random websites or open any ol' e-mail regardless of who it's from), a firewall that checks "outgoing" traffic would stop it from sending anything bad out (like where you are, what you're doing, SPAM to other computers, etc.). So even if you're behind a proxy or router a firewall could help. I've stuck with the one I had from long ago so I'm not current on what firewalls still support '98, I would imagine there are free ones that still do but I don't know what they'd be (if there are "free" ones at all any more). Just check the list of free software here on the boards, visit the sites and see if they support '98 or have "legacy" versions that do. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
martymas Posted February 2, 2009 Author Report Share Posted February 2, 2009 back in the old days i used to install trend micro scanner and firewall combobut that is a long time agoi presume that is all pro these daysthanks for the advicei emailed microsoft and they dont support the sys any morea friend gave me the disk to test out and with every ones help ive got it going i wont persever with it as i have a machine with vista and one with xp dual boot with ubutnubit this was a lesson for methanks all for your inputmuch appreciatedmarty Quote Link to post Share on other sites
MrBill Posted February 4, 2009 Report Share Posted February 4, 2009 (edited) glad the link can be of help i thought of you when i recieved theemail he is a member of this board but at this stage ide like him to remain annon until he approves of me posting his namenow jd what sort of fire wall is needed for win 98m ive already installed a virus scannerso i need to follow your adviceat least this is giving vista a restthe machine with 98 is very old and very crotchetyive seen that message before windos will closeit used to happen if you had to many applis at oncethose days i used to use alt cntr deletebugger thati have to get used to waiting with a bit more patientswith xp you could load avast and adaware both at the same time but not so with win98martyI am always anonymous. The site that I sent you has updates to 98 that you can't get from MS anymore. It has been a while since since I have used any of them. Edited February 4, 2009 by MrBill Quote Link to post Share on other sites
martymas Posted February 5, 2009 Author Report Share Posted February 5, 2009 thanks bill for that link i now have all the win98se updates on this comptonce i downloaded them from your linki went to win updatesand they were listed thereso i installed the lothope JD has some success with themthis compt wont install ubuntu so 98 is the next best thingso thanks again bill your a bloody beautymarty Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.