iccaros Posted March 1, 2005 Report Share Posted March 1, 2005 http://www.denverpost.com/Stories/0,1413,3...2735094,00.html2 points the story touches on but misses in my openion...1) the Linux and Mac OSX boxes needed no updates to be secure..2) if windows is taken over in 18 then you do not even have time to install SP2 for a new system. before being taken over..I do think MS is doing better in the secuering the OS but this is only becase of presser by compatition from linux/bsa/and Mac OSX Quote Link to post Share on other sites
hitest Posted March 1, 2005 Report Share Posted March 1, 2005 http://www.denverpost.com/Stories/0,1413,3...2735094,00.html2 points the story touches on but misses in my openion...1) the Linux and Mac OSX boxes needed no updates to be secure..2) if windows is taken over in 18 then you do not even have time to install SP2 for a new system. before being taken over..I do think MS is doing better in the secuering the OS but this is only becase of presser by compatition from linux/bsa/and Mac OSX Yet another reason why I'm happy I'm not a windows user.Linux rules.Thanks for the link, iccaros.It's frightening to think of all of those unpatched windows virus machines out there. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.