JDoors Posted May 20, 2007 Report Share Posted May 20, 2007 ... It had a crappy 28.8 mwave dial-up modem........the worst Internet experience you can imagine, lol. Hey, I started with a 300 baud modem. Does that translate into 0.3K? 'Course it was all (DOS) text back then, so it was faster than my DSL is now. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
hitest Posted May 20, 2007 Report Share Posted May 20, 2007 ... It had a crappy 28.8 mwave dial-up modem........the worst Internet experience you can imagine, lol. Hey, I started with a 300 baud modem. Does that translate into 0.3K? 'Course it was all (DOS) text back then, so it was faster than my DSL is now.My slowest modem was a 9600 baud modem that was useful for downloading e-mail on my Windows 3.1 units. I remember when a web browser (Netscape 1.0) would fit on a floppy disk. Netscape had its heyday with Netscape 3.04 and then along came IE. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
JDoors Posted May 21, 2007 Report Share Posted May 21, 2007 My slowest modem was a 9600 baud modem that was useful for downloading e-mail on my Windows 3.1 units. I remember when a web browser (Netscape 1.0) would fit on a floppy disk. Netscape had its heyday with Netscape 3.04 and then along came IE. That was back in my upgrade-aholic days (discussed elsewhere) so I went through; 300, 2400, 9600, 24k (I think) then the 56k. Was there a faster one? Anyway, then "acceleration" (and I remember all the controversy over that, "it does nothing" they'd say, while I noticed great improvement). Stuck with that forever before DSL came down in price to equal dial-up. Still waiting for direct fiber-optic (which'll blow my mind I'm sure). Quote Link to post Share on other sites
hitest Posted May 21, 2007 Report Share Posted May 21, 2007 That was back in my upgrade-aholic days (discussed elsewhere) so I went through; 300, 2400, 9600, 24k (I think) then the 56k. Was there a faster one? Anyway, then "acceleration" (and I remember all the controversy over that, "it does nothing" they'd say, while I noticed great improvement). Stuck with that forever before DSL came down in price to equal dial-up. Still waiting for direct fiber-optic (which'll blow my mind I'm sure).Yeah, I loved it when I finally got DSL, I love the speed of broadband. Direct fiber-optic! That sounds cool, is that like a T1 or something? Is that going to be pricey? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
bar5 Posted May 22, 2007 Author Report Share Posted May 22, 2007 In my neck of the woods (literally) we have been talking about getting some kind of broadband, but no one will install it, too expensive, not enough homes I guess.So now we are talking about wireless high speed internet. I don't know anything about wireless high speed internet.It has to be better than dial-up. Anything is better. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.