Pierce Posted August 3, 2006 Report Share Posted August 3, 2006 Real player sucks.. now look what they have done..http://news.zdnet.com/2100-9588_22-6101645...g=zdfd.newsfeedPierce Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Naming is hard Posted August 3, 2006 Report Share Posted August 3, 2006 Huh....are you kidding me. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Pierce Posted August 3, 2006 Author Report Share Posted August 3, 2006 That website is owned by cnet, and is used by thousands of IT professionals, and its a bit early/late for aprils fools...Pierce Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Dan72 Posted August 3, 2006 Report Share Posted August 3, 2006 (edited) i think you can disable the installation of real when installing firefox Edited August 3, 2006 by Dan72 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
xxkbxx Posted August 3, 2006 Report Share Posted August 3, 2006 i think you can disable the installation of rel when installing firefoxIt's just the fact they connect bad software with decent ones.Overall the issue [HOLD ON, BUFFERING] will be dealing with Realplayer's crappiness Quote Link to post Share on other sites
JDoors Posted August 3, 2006 Report Share Posted August 3, 2006 I dislike the Realplayer but still have it because some content is only available in that format. Still it's a pain to "undo" or clean up whatever it does when I play even ONE file through it. Realplayer is the Pigpen of media players. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Pierce Posted August 3, 2006 Author Report Share Posted August 3, 2006 http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/08/03/re...ox_distro_deal/Its going to ship with firefox and/or google tool bar, not the other way around. Still, i dont like FF, and havnt used itin ages.Pierce Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Dan72 Posted August 3, 2006 Report Share Posted August 3, 2006 i use real player alternitive Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Naming is hard Posted August 3, 2006 Report Share Posted August 3, 2006 Firefox is my personal favorite browser, im a huge supporter of open source =P. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Pierce Posted August 4, 2006 Author Report Share Posted August 4, 2006 If you use the default homepage you support it more than you think. They get 5c for every search. You do 20 a day, your giving them $1..Pierce Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Naming is hard Posted August 4, 2006 Report Share Posted August 4, 2006 If you use the default homepage you support it more than you think. They get 5c for every search. You do 20 a day, your giving them $1..PierceIm well aware of that =P Quote Link to post Share on other sites
xxkbxx Posted August 4, 2006 Report Share Posted August 4, 2006 If you use the default homepage you support it more than you think. They get 5c for every search. You do 20 a day, your giving them $1..Pierce That's a lot of nuts! When I had firefox I just used google.com instead of their version. I might move to opera or FF when I go to college - it's not worth messing up my parents when they are used to IE Quote Link to post Share on other sites
martymas Posted August 5, 2006 Report Share Posted August 5, 2006 good one pierce.in the days when firefox had no problemsit was the rageand used because the users thought nothing could go wrong with it but as it be come more popularit started to show it had chinks now many more people are daming the browseri saw this many moons ago i didnt have a lot of succes with it and i posted a hundred times about its pitfallsand i got plasteredfor it this is the third post ive seen from people not happy with it one here one at g4 and one at world startand you should have seen the excuses the firefox users made in defending the overrated browseri use slim browser and it is open sourceit is 10 times smaller than any other browserit is fast and like FF it has tab browsingalso it isnt bloated bygooglethank god we have some one who is honestile probably cop a lot of flacfor my postbut it isnt what i havent experenced in the pastim only speaking from my experiencesmarty Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Pierce Posted August 5, 2006 Author Report Share Posted August 5, 2006 ive been using opera since may of 2005, and i paid for it before it went free.FireFox truly sucks, and i have said it before on this site:http://www.besttechie.net/forums/index.php...&hl=firefoxhttp://www.besttechie.net/forums/index.php...&hl=firefoxFireFox is a stupid bandwagon, its really not a great browser.Pierce Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jcl Posted August 6, 2006 Report Share Posted August 6, 2006 You know, I'm really starting to hate Opera users. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Naming is hard Posted August 6, 2006 Report Share Posted August 6, 2006 You know, I'm really starting to hate Opera users.Seem to think there to cool for school latly eh?Firefox is a great browser 0_o. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Pierce Posted August 6, 2006 Author Report Share Posted August 6, 2006 Opera has way more features than firefox.Back and ForwardLeft Click -> Righ clickorRight click -> left clickScroll threw tabsLeft click, scroll up/downMake a tab a new window:Drag tab to task barWigits:FF has extensions but nowhere near as coolBittorent supportFF.. doesent have this..A better interface for showing you bad xml/rdfFirefox, uh, its broken "HERE" on line 4098.. yeah as if its going to be easy to find that errorYou CANT change the number of connections opera opens to a browserFirefox: yeah, buddy open 100 connections and jam out the webserver, sure they can afford to buy really expensive hardware for you to do that!Opera is smaller.. and includes a mail client while its at itOhh. heres one, opera releases memory when you minimize it, firefox doesnt!!So, still hate Opera? If you hate me more GOOD! Pierce Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jcl Posted August 6, 2006 Report Share Posted August 6, 2006 (edited) Back and ForwardAren't useful to me. I don't use back and forward that often and, because I'm usually on a laptop, keyboard shortcuts are easier than mouse gestures and chords.Scroll threw tabsLeft click, scroll up/downI think Firefox has scroll wheel tab paging. Anyway, my laptop doesn't have a scroll wheel Make a tab a new window:Drag tab to task barThat I do miss. There's probably an extension that does it. I don't use multiple windows often enough to look.Wigits:FF has extensions but nowhere near as coolUtility and usability are more important than cool. I don't need a shiny four-function calculator in my web browser. Bittorent supportDid nothing but get in my way. I like my BT clients.A better interface for showing you bad xml/rdfFirefox, uh, its broken "HERE" on line 4098.. yeah as if its going to be easy to find that errorSwitch to vim window, type ctrl-[4098G I don't think I've ever written syntactically-invalid XML.Opera is smaller.. and includes a mail client while its at itTrue. On the other hand you more potential for code reuse with Firefox. When XULRunner is ready you should able to host Firefox and Thunderbird (and maybe Sunbird, Songbird, and the rest) on a single XULRunning installation with the common code and data shared between the apps. Even now I have a second browser, Epiphany, sharing Firefox's XPCOM and Gecko libraries.Ohh. heres one, opera releases memory when you minimize it, firefox doesnt!!Firefox reduces its working set when it's minimized, or at least it did until recently. I believe Windows also automatically reduces the working set of processes with no raised windows. I'm not convinced it's a good idea anyway.So, still hate Opera? If you hate me more GOOD! Opera users. I don't have a problem with the browser.Now, a question. One Firefox feature that Opera seems to lack and that I can't live without is address bar history completion sorted by frequency of use. Is there a switch in preferences or a plugin or something that provides that in Opera? Edited August 6, 2006 by jcl Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Pierce Posted August 6, 2006 Author Report Share Posted August 6, 2006 Back and ForwardAren't useful to me. I don't use back and forward that often and, because I'm usually on a laptop, keyboard shortcuts are easier than mouse gestures and chords.Scroll threw tabsLeft click, scroll up/downI think Firefox has scroll wheel tab paging. Anyway, my laptop doesn't have a scroll wheel Make a tab a new window:Drag tab to task barThat I do miss. There's probably an extension that does it. I don't use multiple windows often enough to look.Wigits:FF has extensions but nowhere near as coolUtility and usability are more important than cool. I don't need a shiny four-function calculator in my web browser. Bittorent supportDid nothing but get in my way. I like my BT clients.A better interface for showing you bad xml/rdfFirefox, uh, its broken "HERE" on line 4098.. yeah as if its going to be easy to find that errorSwitch to vim window, type ctrl-[4098G I don't think I've ever written syntactically-invalid XML.Opera is smaller.. and includes a mail client while its at itTrue. On the other hand you more potential for code reuse with Firefox. When XULRunner is ready you should able to host Firefox and Thunderbird (and maybe Sunbird, Songbird, and the rest) on a single XULRunning installation with the common code and data shared between the apps. Even now I have a second browser, Epiphany, sharing Firefox's XPCOM and Gecko libraries.Ohh. heres one, opera releases memory when you minimize it, firefox doesnt!!Firefox reduces its working set when it's minimized, or at least it did until recently. I believe Windows also automatically reduces the working set of processes with no raised windows. I'm not convinced it's a good idea anyway.So, still hate Opera? If you hate me more GOOD! Opera users. I don't have a problem with the browser.Now, a question. One Firefox feature that Opera seems to lack and that I can't live without is address bar history completion sorted by frequency of use. Is there a switch in preferences or a plugin or something that provides that in Opera?The scroll wheel doesnt work in FireFox for tab-switching.Use 9 lately? Though i do miss the auto fill feature on search boxes. At the same time, i miss not having magic wand on firefox(password utility manager).Releasing memory sets? I checked the latest version, it doesnt and was highlighted by ZDnet.com when they were reviewing ie7, which does it.Writing syntaticaly correct XML in vim? Well, okay, but writing dynamic sets, with millions of tripples? Eh.. the stored data could be at fault. At least FF2b2 has better displaying of xml content, compared to Opera, which is awful.The single platform, sounds like a cool framework. So you have to download this "box" and everything plugs into it?The wigits arnt limited to browser either. That calculator can sit on your desktop with opera minimized into the system tray. I seen somebody have a google bar perminantly open, (a proper sized one that is nice and big, i hate the one in the top right).Pierce Quote Link to post Share on other sites
bearskin Posted August 7, 2006 Report Share Posted August 7, 2006 I use firefox and like it.I don't use google toobar or tab browsing.and I don't particullary give a da*** about other people opinions because I never try to force people to change their browser. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
DarkestDream Posted August 7, 2006 Report Share Posted August 7, 2006 The scroll wheel doesnt work in FireFox for tab-switching.There a extesion for it. Tab Mix, TBE and TBP have a ability to do that. im not sure, i dont use the feature.FF has extensions but nowhere near as coolIt didnt need to be cool. it only ability is functionability. If it works, then it works. that all i need from extension.Bittorent supportDont need BT supported web browser. I rather clients, clients have more functionability than web browser does.Releasing memory sets? I checked the latest version, it doesnt and was highlighted by ZDnet.com when they were reviewing ie7, which does it.I never noticed it and never complain about it. it didnt affect me. IE is embedded in Window. that the reason why it does well with window when IE is minimized. Opera is smaller.. and includes a mail client while its at itTrue. and i dont need a mail client. I have Gmail and i use Google Personalize Homepage. and i use my sidekick as a email client with Gmail's pop/ssl. I hate to use email client.all i need a functionabiliy/flexiblability/customability browser and that is Firefox. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
robroy Posted August 7, 2006 Report Share Posted August 7, 2006 I use both ff and opera and like both of them. Just as long as I dont have to use IE I'm happy Quote Link to post Share on other sites
DarkestDream Posted August 7, 2006 Report Share Posted August 7, 2006 I use both ff and opera and like both of them. Just as long as I dont have to use IE I'm happy I like Opera, but it didnt suit me for some reason. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
martymas Posted August 7, 2006 Report Share Posted August 7, 2006 what has happened arnt FF users trying to jam ff down our throatslike it has been for several yearswhy i find browsers no different unless you want strees a pointi thought this bu-----t was finishedi repeated this a hundred times a browser is only as good as the userif you get s---t through your browserisnt that your fault and not the applicationbuggered if i can understand this thread rearing its head again ff v other browsersmarty Quote Link to post Share on other sites
jcl Posted August 7, 2006 Report Share Posted August 7, 2006 (edited) The scroll wheel doesnt work in FireFox for tab-switching.Huh. I wonder what I thinking of. [Later] Ah, it was Epiphany.Use 9 lately?Sure, yesterday. I was using when I wrote that post.Releasing memory sets? I checked the latest version, it doesnt and was highlighted by ZDnet.com when they were reviewing ie7, which does it.The default behavior was changed in recent releases to prevent thrashing; you have to set config.trim_on_minimize to true. When it's enable it works very well -- the WS can drop below 1 MiB if you're lucky -- but it can take a minute or two to page back in when you raise the window. That's one reason I'm not convinced it's a good idea. (The other reason is that I don't know what the point is. If the process is idle the WS will decay naturally. If it isn't, decreasing the WS will cause thrashing.)Well, okay, but writing dynamic sets, with millions of tripples?By hand? No, I can't say I've done that. So you have to download this "box" and everything plugs into it?Right. Firefox, Thunderbird, etc would become XULRunner extensions. XR would handle installation and updates. The code that's shared between the Mozilla apps -- the filesystem, network, and UI layers, the profile manager, the layout and JavaScript engines -- would be factored out into XR. XR is about 15 MiB and Firefox-on-XR appears to be about 2.5 MiB. More than half of that is the chrome for the user interface; the executable is 12 KiB The wigits arnt limited to browser either. That calculator can sit on your desktop with opera minimized into the system tray.I don't want desktop widgets. If I did I'd install gDesklets or buy a Mac and use Dashboard. If I'm going to be switching windows -- or, God forbid, desktop layers -- I may as well get a full-blown whatever application and leave it idling in the background. Edited August 7, 2006 by jcl Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.