martymas Posted November 7, 2008 Report Share Posted November 7, 2008 a friend sent this from the usaclaiming the problems wti the dollar noteas a supporter of obama winning the election i thought it was in bad tase to show a president elect as an unreadable $notehowever judge for your self Quote Link to post Share on other sites
JDoors Posted November 7, 2008 Report Share Posted November 7, 2008 VERY bad taste. It's an old (and derogatory) joke from like the 1920's or 30's or thereabouts. BTW Marty, you were worried we couldn't elect an African American without some kind of incident? We managed to do it before any industrialized country, didn't we? Any blacks running Germany? France? England? Any European country? China? Japan? Canada? Nope, nope, nope, nope, nope and nope (unless I've forgotten someone somewhere). Does New Zealand elect indigenous peoples to high positions in government? Sorry about being so uninformed about NZ's political scene. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
martymas Posted November 7, 2008 Author Report Share Posted November 7, 2008 hi yes you are correctyou have done what the rest of the world didnt expectbut remember blacks are citizens of the usa and up until now they have never beentreated as sutch ye we have a indigenous members of parlimentmaori is the ethinic groupand they are allowed to have thier own partywho get elected by their own people we dont have presidents the prime minister is the highest in the landbut we have many ministers in high placesour foriegn minister is a native of nzand travels all over the worldmeeting leaders he was intervied by bushhe was appointed because we wanted to make the world see we are all oneirrespective of our color or creedand i can tell you we are so proud of the usa for casting their predjduice aside and elect a non whiteand i speak for peopleoutside of the usathere is still some negitive flo backi have a friend in floridawho sends me many letters and articles and not in favour of obamabut the american public have spoken by a landslidetoday is our election day and i was so wrapped up in the usa elections i for get who to vote forany how good luckto all you electors and i feel you have made a good choice tho time will tellmarty Quote Link to post Share on other sites
irregularjoe Posted November 8, 2008 Report Share Posted November 8, 2008 (edited) a friend sent this from the usaclaiming the problems wti the dollar noteas a supporter of obama winning the election i thought it was in bad tase to show a president elect as an unreadable $notehowever judge for your selfMarty:That is about as base, hateful, ignorant, racist, wrong, stupid, prejudist, hurtful, harmful. (I can go on but I think you get the gist of it) as anything I have seen in a LONG time.When I was a child my family took a trip to Florida. 1960. I was six. While passing through the south I witnessed first hand the "White Only" signs at places that we stopped along the way. Restauarants, bathrooms at gas stations, etc. Although only being six years old, I knew that something was very wrong with that. I asked my parents about it. They said what most parents probably said in those days: "that's just the way it is down here". That picture of the acceptance of hate and ignorance always stayed with me. It made me want to know WHY that kind of organized pathological behavior was the norm in so many places. Things in this country have definately changed for the better in the past 48 years. The change has been seismic in scope. It has not been easy. And it has come only because of a lot of sacrifice from a lot of people. I am proud of this country. I haven't been able to say that for a long time. It feels good!JoeP.S.If I were you, I'd have a talking to with that "friend" of yours that sent you that picture.J Edited November 8, 2008 by irregularjoe Quote Link to post Share on other sites
JDoors Posted November 8, 2008 Report Share Posted November 8, 2008 hi yes you are correctyou have done what the rest of the world didnt expectbut remember blacks are citizens of the usa and up until now they have never beentreated as sutch ... No wonder "the rest of the world didn't expect" an African-American leader with that attitude. Until NOW blacks have NEVER been treated as CITIZENS???? That's so wrong I don't even know what to say. I vaguely recall knowing about the Maori and their "separate but equal" party. Thanks for the additional info. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Bubba Bob Posted November 8, 2008 Report Share Posted November 8, 2008 but remember blacks are citizens of the usa and up until now they have never beentreated as sutch ...Is this a common sentiment over in NZ? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
martymas Posted November 8, 2008 Author Report Share Posted November 8, 2008 (edited) unfortunately many people round the wprld have this perception that americana dont treat their ethnic groups so well and i read one was the native americiani have to admit before i joined boards like this and others i also had the perception but after communicating with many of you you are the same as me and many of you treat me as an equal friendat one time we had the same problem here when the white settlers invaded the country they took over all aspects of our daily livesand i hated them for it it has taken many years to find there are many good people in the worldand boards like this has helped me to ,understand other peoples viewbut it is better now and i think it is because of our emergration policywe are meeting more diverse peole and it is broadening our perceptionon others in the worldi have many friends who were anti americanbut electing obama has moderated thier views in this short timeso hope fully it will unite your people for the better hope so as ive come to regard many of you as my best friendtho ive never met youthanks for letting me air my views Edited November 8, 2008 by martymas Quote Link to post Share on other sites
irregularjoe Posted November 9, 2008 Report Share Posted November 9, 2008 unfortunately many people round the wprld have this perception that americana dont treat their ethnic groups so well and i read one was the native americiani have to admit before i joined boards like this and others i also had the perception but after communicating with many of you you are the same as me and many of you treat me as an equal friendat one time we had the same problem here when the white settlers invaded the country they took over all aspects of our daily livesand i hated them for it it has taken many years to find there are many good people in the worldand boards like this has helped me to ,understand other peoples viewbut it is better now and i think it is because of our emergration policywe are meeting more diverse peole and it is broadening our perceptionon others in the worldi have many friends who were anti americanbut electing obama has moderated thier views in this short timeso hope fully it will unite your people for the better hope so as ive come to regard many of you as my best friendtho ive never met youthanks for letting me air my viewsMarty:I didn't realize that about New Zealand. I definately need to learn more about your national history. Hopefully you can help me with the details?Thanks,Joe Quote Link to post Share on other sites
JDoors Posted November 9, 2008 Report Share Posted November 9, 2008 ... the american public have spoken by a landslide ... Landslide, huh? He did get a large majority of the electoral votes, but I bet 99% of the world's population can't explain what an electoral vote IS. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
martymas Posted November 9, 2008 Author Report Share Posted November 9, 2008 sorry what i shoild have said the party obama representshas won hands downthey are in control of the white housesorry bout that over sitemarty Quote Link to post Share on other sites
JDoors Posted November 10, 2008 Report Share Posted November 10, 2008 No apology necessary. I saw the word "landslide" in print, right next to the number "51%" (not sure if it was later raised to the 52% seen in that cartoon or what). I was scratching my head. I ASSUME it means a large number of electoral votes, but that's not the usual number used when describing a victory as a "landslide." Just heard (in a podcast) that in a poll in Canada, 80% would have voted for Obama. Now THAT would be a landslide! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
irregularjoe Posted November 12, 2008 Report Share Posted November 12, 2008 (edited) 365 vs. 173 = LandslidePopular vote doesn't matter. Remember 2000? Florida? Gore /Bush? Gore won the popular vote but Bush was appointed anyway. Edited November 12, 2008 by irregularjoe Quote Link to post Share on other sites
JDoors Posted November 12, 2008 Report Share Posted November 12, 2008 365 vs. 173 = LandslidePopular vote doesn't matter. Remember 2000? Florida? Gore /Bush? Gore won the popular vote but Bush was appointed anyway. I already said he got "a large majority" of the electoral votes (67.84% to put it another way). I understand how the electoral college works and how that determines who wins, so the only relevance of bringing up another election's results would be to unnecessarily point out that the popular vote does not determine the winner. And thank goodness the popular vote DOES NOT determine the winner: The population of just a few of the largest cities could negate almost everyone else's votes. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
irregularjoe Posted November 13, 2008 Report Share Posted November 13, 2008 (edited) 365 vs. 173 = LandslidePopular vote doesn't matter. Remember 2000? Florida? Gore /Bush? Gore won the popular vote but Bush was appointed anyway. I already said he got "a large majority" of the electoral votes (67.84% to put it another way). I understand how the electoral college works and how that determines who wins, so the only relevance of bringing up another election's results would be to unnecessarily point out that the popular vote does not determine the winner. And thank goodness the popular vote DOES NOT determine the winner: The population of just a few of the largest cities could negate almost everyone else's votes.You are right JDoors. I wasn't quibbling. The number of state electors will no doubt be reconfigured before the next presidential election. The migration of jobs (if there are any left) and people from PA., Ohio, Michigan, to the south is just one example. It's pretty clear which political party will benefit. Currently only Maine and Nebraska can split up electoral votes among the competing candidates. All the other states are "winner take all". Not sure if I completely disagree with the popular vote concept. After all, it's what most people incorrectly believe to be the deciding factor.It's going to make an interesting debate if it ever gets that far. Edited November 13, 2008 by irregularjoe Quote Link to post Share on other sites
hitest Posted November 13, 2008 Report Share Posted November 13, 2008 a friend sent this from the usaclaiming the problems wti the dollar noteas a supporter of obama winning the election i thought it was in bad tase to show a president elect as an unreadable $notehowever judge for your selfMarty:That is about as base, hateful, ignorant, racist, wrong, stupid, prejudist, hurtful, harmful. (I can go on but I think you get the gist of it) as anything I have seen in a LONG time.I agree marty and Joe! This is in very bad taste. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
JDoors Posted November 13, 2008 Report Share Posted November 13, 2008 (edited) ... The number of state electors will no doubt be reconfigured before the next presidential election. The migration of jobs (if there are any left) and people from PA., Ohio, Michigan, to the south is just one example. It's pretty clear which political party will benefit. Currently only Maine and Nebraska can split up electoral votes among the competing candidates. All the other states are "winner take all". Not sure if I completely disagree with the popular vote concept. After all, it's what most people incorrectly believe to be the deciding factor.It's going to make an interesting debate if it ever gets that far. I don't understand how population migration will benefit one party over another -- How's that gonna work? Will people change their allegience solely due to a "new" location? One problem with "winner takes all" is people who vote against the majority in their state sometimes think that vote is "wasted." I disagree, but I don't know how to explain why it matters. Many may not vote at all, which just increases the influence of the majority. I don't know that "most people" think the popular vote determines the winner, the media talks about electoral votes throughout the election. Most people may not FULLY understand how it works, but with, for instance, the example you gave, I think people "get" that the poplular vote isn't the entire story. Every four years talk arises about eliminating electoral voting but it never gets anywhere, though probably not this year since the popular vote was close, the electoral votes weren't, but the results would have been the same -- the controversy usually arises when when the two don't correlate at all. Thank goodness people's attention spans are so short! It's even harder to explain WHY "popular vote" would be a disaster than it is to explain why electoral voting is a better solution.----- Edited November 13, 2008 by JDoors Quote Link to post Share on other sites
sultan_emerr Posted November 16, 2008 Report Share Posted November 16, 2008 (edited) I just hope they don't eliminate QVC!!! Edited November 16, 2008 by sultan_emerr Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.