tg1911 Posted December 22, 2004 Report Share Posted December 22, 2004 In an E-mail I got from EFF (Electronic Frontier Foundation)* EFF Joins Forces with Tor Software ProjectCivil Liberties Group to Support Development of AnonymousInternet Communications SystemSan Francisco - Today EFF announced that it is becoming a sponsor of Tor, a technology project that helps organizations and individuals engage in anonymous communication online. Tor is a network-within-a-network that protects communication from a form of surveillance known as "traffic analysis." Traffic analysis tracks where data goes and when, as well as how much is sent, rather than the content of communications. Knowing the source and destination of Internet traffic allows others to track a person's behavior and interests. This can impact privacy in obvious and secondary ways. For example, an e-commerce site could choose to charge you more for particular items based on your country or institution of origin. It could also threaten your job or physical safety by revealing who and where you are. "EFF is a great organization to work with," said Roger Dingledine, Tor's project leader, who, along with Nick Mathewson, is also a core developer. "EFF understands the importance of anonymity technology for everyone - from the average web surfer, to journalists for community sites like Indymedia, to people living under oppressive regimes. With their support and experience, we can focus on making Tor useful and usable by everyone.""The Tor project is a perfect fit for EFF, because one of our primary goals is to protect the privacy and anonymity of Internet users," said EFF Technology Manager Chris Palmer. "Tor can help people exercise their First Amendment right to free, anonymous speech online. And unlike many other security systems, Tor recognizes that there is no security without user-friendliness - if the mechanism is not accessible, nobody will use it. Tor strikes a balance between performance, usability, and security." For the full press release:http://www.eff.org/news/archives/2004_12.php#002174Tor Project:http://tor.eff.org/Non-technical introduction to Tor:http://tor.eff.org/overview.htmlTechnical research paper on how Tor works:http://tor.eff.org/cvs/tor/doc/design-paper/tor-design.htmlSome EFF victories, this year:* We helped eVisa.com win its fight against the Visa credit card dynasty over fair use of the word "visa" in domain names. * We (with your support) helped derail the government's CAPPS II passenger-profiling system (although we need your help to continue to fight its evil reincarnation, Secure Flight). * We won the Grokster case in the 9th Circuit. The Supreme Court has decided to hear this case in March 2005. * We helped individuals assert their due process rights in cases brought against them by the recording industry. * We put forth our voluntary collective licensing proposal, explaining how artists could get paid without suing music lovers. * We won the case that got Diebold punished for misusing copyright law. * We won the Bunner case, which held that republishing information about reverse engineering was not prohibited by trade secret law. * We started a patent busting campaign and identified the ten most egregious patent threats to technology and freedom. * We were a leader in the fight for a verifiable paper trail on electronic voting machines. * We expanded our international work, participating in the Digital Video Broadcasting group and in WIPO. * We defended Jibjab's fair use of "This Land Is Your Land" in its presidential parody "This Land" and in the process learned that the Woody Guthrie song had fallen into the public domain. * We defended technologists using smart card readers from an overzealous DirecTV. * We (with your support) helped make sure terrible legislation like the PIRATE Act and the Induce Act did not pass. * We drafted a mock legal complaint to show how the Induce Act would kill off technologies like the iPod. * We successfully challenged the Child Online Protection Act at the Supreme Court. * We wrote and circulated a paper on best practices for Online Service Providers. * We fought the expansion of the DMCA, writing amicus briefs supporting Skylink's right to make interoperable garage door openers and Static Control's right to make aftermarket printer cartridges. (We helped win both cases.) * We represented (and continue to represent) Indymedia in an effort to uncover why their servers were seized and to assert their First Amendment rights. * We formed an Advisory Board of some of the smartest people working on these issues.9/11 Legislation Launches Misguided Data-Mining and Domestic Surveillance SchemesOn Friday, President Bush signed into law the IntelligenceReform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 (IRTPA),launching several flawed "security" schemes that EFF haslong opposed. The media has focused on turf wars betweenthe intelligence and defense communities, but the realstory is how IRTPA trades basic rights for the illusion ofsecurity. For instance:~ Section 1016 - a.k.a. "TIA II" ~A clause authorizing the creation of a massive "InformationSharing Environment" (ISE) to link "all appropriateFederal, State, local, and tribal entities, and theprivate sector."This vast network would link the information in public andprivate databases, posing the same kind of threat toour privacy and freedom that the notorious TerrorismInformation Awareness (TIA) program did. Yet the IRTPA contains no meaningful safeguards against unchecked data mining other than directing the President to issue guidelines. It also includes a definition of "terrorist information" that is frighteningly broad.~ Section 4012 and Sections 7201-7220 - a.k.a. "CAPPS III" ~A number of provisions that provide the statutory basis for "Secure Flight," the government's third try at a controversial passenger-screening system that has consistently failed to pass muster for protecting passenger privacy.The basic concept: the government will force commercialair carriers to hand over your private travel information and compare it with a "consolidated and integrated terrorist watchlist." It will also establish a massive "counterterrorist travel intelligence" infrastructure that calls for travel data mining ("recognition of travel patterns, tactics, and behavior exhibited by terrorists").It's not clear how the government would use the travelpatterns of millions of Americans to catch thesmall number of individuals worldwide who are planning terrorist attacks. In fact, this approach hasbeen thoroughly debunked by security experts. (Seehttp://www.schneier.com/essay-052.html.) What is clear is that the system will create fertile ground for constitutional violations and the abuse of private information. The latest Privacy Act notice on Secure Flight shows that the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) still doesn't have a plan for how long the government will keep your private information, nor has it mapped out adequate procedures for correcting your "file" if you are wrongly flagged as a terrorist.~ Section 6001 - a.k.a. "PATRIOT III" ~Straight from the infamous "PATRIOT II" draft legislationleaked to the public last year comes a provision thatallows the government to use secret foreign intelligence warrants and wiretap orders against people unconnected to any international terrorist group or foreign nation. This represents yet another step in the ongoing destruction of even the most basic legal protections for those whom the government suspects are terrorists. ~ Sections 7208-7220 - a.k.a. "Papers, Please" ~Just as EFF, the ACLU, and a number of other civil liberties groups feared, IRTPA creates the basis for a de facto national ID system using biometrics. Driven by misguided political consensus, the law calls for a "global standard of identification" and minimum national standards for birth certificates, driver's licenses and state ID cards, and Social Security cards and numbers. It also directs the Secretary of Homeland Security to establish new standards for ID for domestic air travelers. Identification is not security. Indeed, the 9/11 Commission report revealed that a critical stumbling block in identifying foreign terrorists is the inability to evaluate *foreign* information and records. Yet we are placing disproportionate emphasis ondomestic surveillance, opening the door to a standardized "internal passport" - the hallmark of a totalitarian regime. For this piece online:http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/archives/002172.phpFor the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 (IRTPA):http://news.findlaw.com/usatoday/docs/terr...m/irtpa2004.pdfIf you care about preserving your privacy and basicconstitutional freedoms, help us fight the good fight by joining EFF today:https://secure.eff.org/It's a Small World After AllEd Felten and Alex Halderman have written a P2P application in only 15 lines of code to illustrate the futility of regulating the software. It's called TinyP2P, and it allows users to create "small world" networks forsharing files:http://www.freedom-to-tinker.com/tinyp2p.htmlPutting the World's Greatest Libraries OnlineGoogle is working with four university libraries - Stanford, Michigan, Harvard, and Oxford - and the New York Public Library in an ambitious plan to scan their holdings and put them on the Internet:http://www.eff.org/cgi/tiny?urlID=363(San Francisco Chronicle)Apple Makes iPods Incompatible with HarmonyRealNetworks' Harmony music service doesn't work with the newest iPod software, leaving customers who upgrade with unplayable files. Aren't the DRM wars great?http://www.eff.org/cgi/tiny?urlID=357(CNET)Sony Picks on Blogger Over Jeopardy SpoilerWhen blogger Jason Kottke posted an audio clip of Ken Jennings' final appearance on Jeopardy, he wasn't expecting the show's parent company to call in the lawyers. Sony didn't send nastygrams to the Washington Post or an ABC affiliate that disseminated the same info:http://www.eff.org/cgi/tiny?urlID=350(Red Herring) Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.